Is the excessive use of camera lens blur really necessary? Merely because a camera is capable of blurring its surroundings doesn't necessitate its frequent application.

Is the excessive use of camera lens blur really necessary? Merely because a camera is capable of blurring its surroundings doesn't necessitate its frequent application.

In the realm of photography, the use of shallow depth of field has become a popular trend in recent years, particularly among portrait photographers. This technique, which blurs the background to isolate the subject, gained prominence with the rise of large-aperture lenses and advancements in camera and lens technology. However, this wasn't the dominant style in early 20th-century photography.

Photographers like Ansel Adams and the Group f/64 in the 1930s advocated for deep focus, using small apertures to keep images sharp throughout the scene, particularly in landscape photography. The choice between shallow and deep focus depends on the photographic intent.

Shallow depth of field is excellent for portraits, as it reduces distractions and guides the viewer's eye. However, it limits the overall scene detail visible in focus. On the other hand, deeper focus or greater depth of field is preferable in landscape, scientific, macro, and documentary photography where detail across a wide range of distances is important.

This trend towards shallow depth of field is often seen as alluring, expensive, professional, and cinematic. Yet, it's important to note that this isn't a new phenomenon in photography. Photographers such as Henri Cartier-Bresson, Joel Meyerowitz, William Eggleston, Arnold Newman, and Daido Moriyama are examples of great photographers who rarely prioritize shallow depth of field.

Kalum Carter, a photographer, filmmaker, creative director, and writer with over 10 years of experience in visual storytelling, emphasizes the idea that photography isn't always about isolating things; sometimes, it's about including them and letting everything sit together in focus. Kalum's work highlights the power of visual storytelling and fosters an appreciation for the impact of photography.

In an attempt to challenge themselves, Kalum finds themselves reaching for simpler tools like GF 35-70mm kit lens and GF 100-200mm that only open up to f/4.5 or f/5.6. This slows them down, makes them think more about composition and light, and forces them to question if they really need that blur.

In conclusion, while shallow depth of field is a powerful creative tool, it is not universally "better." The choice should be driven by the subject, style, and storytelling goals rather than defaulting to shallow or deep focus. The dominance of shallow depth of field might be less in the physical world of prints than it seems online. As photographers continue to explore and experiment with different techniques, the debate over shallow depth of field will undoubtedly continue to evolve.

1. When editing videos, the choice between a shallow depth of field and a wider depth of field can significantly impact the visual storytelling, mimicking the trends in photography.
2. In the realm of mirrorless cameras, advancements in technology have made it easier for photographers to achieve shallow depth of field, making it a popular choice for those looking for a cinematic look.
3. For lifestyle and home-and-garden photography, a shallow depth of field can be used effectively to create a sense of intimacy and focus on the subject, while maintaining a sense of the surrounding environment.
4. In a review of the latest drone camera, the ability to adjust the aperture and ISO allows for both shallow and deep focus, providing photographers with more creative control in their work.
5. Although shallow depth of field is often associated with expensive, professional equipment, news photographers often utilize smaller, compact cameras with larger apertures to achieve the same effect.
6. Landscape photographers, such as Ansel Adams, have traditionally favored deep focus, using smaller apertures to capture the scene's entirety in sharp detail.
7. The technique of shallow depth of field has a rich history, with notable photographers such as Henri Cartier-Bresson and Daido Moriyama rarely prioritizing this style, instead preferring a deeper focus.
8. The ongoing debate about shallow depth of field in photography highlights the importance of technique and personal artistic vision, with photographers continuing to experiment with both shallow and deep focus to achieve their desired creative results.

Read also: